Research paper
Computational MultiscaleEach sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
17 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Dataset Size | FBA flux profiles | 2000profiles | — | |||
| Regression R2 | Random Forest | 0.999976 | — | |||
| Regression R2 | XGBoost | 0.9997702 | — | |||
| Silhouette Score | k=3 | 0.334 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster1 | 0.472gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster2 | 0.493gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster3 | 0.527gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster4 | 0.505gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Essential Reaction Count | essential reactions after knockout | 18 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | baseline | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | optimized | 1.041gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux Improvement Factor | fold improvement | 12.13 | — | |||
| Generative Profile Variance | GAN-generated flux configurations | 0.124 | — | |||
| Feasible Profile Count | stoichiometrically feasible GAN outputs | 0profiles | — | |||
| Loss Value | Gloss | 1.619 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Biomass Flux | Pareto front optimum | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Amino Acid Biosynthesis Score | total amino-acid biosynthesis score | 1000.029mmol·gDW−1·hr−1 | — |
Related documents with shared materials, methods, properties, or citations.
Modeling phase separation in polymer-derived silicon carbonitride ceramics through extended machine learning molecular dynamics
Physics-Informed Neural Solvers for Periodic Quantum Eigenproblems
Thermal boundary conductance in standalone and non-standalone GaN/AlN heterostructures predicted using machine learning interatomic potentials
Strain-Dependent Wetting of Graphene
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
17 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Dataset Size | FBA flux profiles | 2000profiles | — | |||
| Regression R2 | Random Forest | 0.999976 | — | |||
| Regression R2 | XGBoost | 0.9997702 | — | |||
| Silhouette Score | k=3 | 0.334 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster1 | 0.472gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster2 | 0.493gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster3 | 0.527gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster4 | 0.505gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Essential Reaction Count | essential reactions after knockout | 18 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | baseline | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | optimized | 1.041gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux Improvement Factor | fold improvement | 12.13 | — | |||
| Generative Profile Variance | GAN-generated flux configurations | 0.124 | — | |||
| Feasible Profile Count | stoichiometrically feasible GAN outputs | 0profiles | — | |||
| Loss Value | Gloss | 1.619 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Biomass Flux | Pareto front optimum | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Amino Acid Biosynthesis Score | total amino-acid biosynthesis score | 1000.029mmol·gDW−1·hr−1 | — |
Related documents with shared materials, methods, properties, or citations.
Modeling phase separation in polymer-derived silicon carbonitride ceramics through extended machine learning molecular dynamics
Physics-Informed Neural Solvers for Periodic Quantum Eigenproblems
Thermal boundary conductance in standalone and non-standalone GaN/AlN heterostructures predicted using machine learning interatomic potentials
Strain-Dependent Wetting of Graphene
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
17 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Dataset Size | FBA flux profiles | 2000profiles | — | |||
| Regression R2 | Random Forest | 0.999976 | — | |||
| Regression R2 | XGBoost | 0.9997702 | — | |||
| Silhouette Score | k=3 | 0.334 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster1 | 0.472gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster2 | 0.493gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster3 | 0.527gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster4 | 0.505gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Essential Reaction Count | essential reactions after knockout | 18 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | baseline | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | optimized | 1.041gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux Improvement Factor | fold improvement | 12.13 | — | |||
| Generative Profile Variance | GAN-generated flux configurations | 0.124 | — | |||
| Feasible Profile Count | stoichiometrically feasible GAN outputs | 0profiles | — | |||
| Loss Value | Gloss | 1.619 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Biomass Flux | Pareto front optimum | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Amino Acid Biosynthesis Score | total amino-acid biosynthesis score | 1000.029mmol·gDW−1·hr−1 | — |
Related documents with shared materials, methods, properties, or citations.
Modeling phase separation in polymer-derived silicon carbonitride ceramics through extended machine learning molecular dynamics
Physics-Informed Neural Solvers for Periodic Quantum Eigenproblems
Thermal boundary conductance in standalone and non-standalone GaN/AlN heterostructures predicted using machine learning interatomic potentials
Strain-Dependent Wetting of Graphene
Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.
17 properties
| Type | Label | Value | Material | Sample | Condition | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Dataset Size | FBA flux profiles | 2000profiles | — | |||
| Regression R2 | Random Forest | 0.999976 | — | |||
| Regression R2 | XGBoost | 0.9997702 | — | |||
| Silhouette Score | k=3 | 0.334 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster1 | 0.472gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster2 | 0.493gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster3 | 0.527gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Cluster Mean Biomass Flux | cluster4 | 0.505gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Essential Reaction Count | essential reactions after knockout | 18 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | baseline | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux | optimized | 1.041gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Biomass Flux Improvement Factor | fold improvement | 12.13 | — | |||
| Generative Profile Variance | GAN-generated flux configurations | 0.124 | — | |||
| Feasible Profile Count | stoichiometrically feasible GAN outputs | 0profiles | — | |||
| Loss Value | Gloss | 1.619 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Biomass Flux | Pareto front optimum | 0.0858gDW·hr−1 | — | |||
| Pareto Optimum Amino Acid Biosynthesis Score | total amino-acid biosynthesis score | 1000.029mmol·gDW−1·hr−1 | — |
Related documents with shared materials, methods, properties, or citations.
Modeling phase separation in polymer-derived silicon carbonitride ceramics through extended machine learning molecular dynamics
Physics-Informed Neural Solvers for Periodic Quantum Eigenproblems
Thermal boundary conductance in standalone and non-standalone GaN/AlN heterostructures predicted using machine learning interatomic potentials
Strain-Dependent Wetting of Graphene