When Adiabaticity Is Not Enough to Study Topological Phases in Solid-State Physics: Comparing the Berry and Aharonov-Anandan Phases in 2D Materials

Abdiel de Jesús Espinosa-Champoa; Alejandro Kunold; Gerardo G. Naumis

doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ae11d3

Paper

Atlas literature

Research paper

TheoreticalComputational Kinetic Model

When Adiabaticity Is Not Enough to Study Topological Phases in Solid-State Physics: Comparing the Berry and Aharonov-Anandan Phases in 2D Materials

Abdiel de Jesús Espinosa-Champoa, Alejandro Kunold, Gerardo G. Naumis

arXiv·2025·10.1088/2515-7639/ae11d3·arXiv:2502.11875

Samples

Each sample groups how it was prepared, characterized, and measured. Click a card to expand.

Time-driven graphene modeled in reciprocal space under a homogeneous periodic vector potential using the Dirac-Bloch formalism and Floquet theory.

No measurements recorded

SimulatedCStudied Material

Why these are connected

Related documents with shared materials, methods, properties, or citations.

paper2024
Uniquely identifying quantum Hall phases in charge neutral graphene
topic Topological Materials and Phenomenatopic Quantum and electron transport phenomenatopic Graphene research and applicationsmaterial carbon
paper2025
Dipole representation of composite fermions in graphene quantum Hall systems

When Adiabaticity Is Not Enough to Study Topological Phases in Solid-State Physics: Comparing the Berry and Aharonov-Anandan Phases in 2D Materials | Matter42 Literature