Patent
US 9,376,537calcium chloride solution
CaCl₂
TEM images (FIGS. 2A and 2B) of graphene oxide in graphene oxide/water sol show obvious folding structures at the edge of graphene oxide.
HRTEM images (FIGS. 3A and 3B) of graphene oxide/styrene butadiene rubber nanocomposite (Example 4) show graphene oxide is evenly dispersed in the SBR substrate in a form of single sheet.
XRD profiles (FIG. 4) of graphite oxide, SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 1), and graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizates (Examples 1 and 9). Characteristic diffraction peaks of graphene oxide do not occur in the nanocomposite, indicating highly delaminated single-sheet dispersion.
FIG. 5A shows clear Schallamach pattern for graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizate (Example 10), indicating rubber substrate and graphene oxide are not massively delaminated and interfacial bonding is excellent. FIG. 5B shows white carbon black/SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 2) for comparison.
Tensile Strength At 100 Percent Elongation |
| 3.7 MPa |
graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Tensile Strength At 300 Percent Elongation | 11.1 MPa | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Air Permeability Coefficient | 2.35e-? m² s⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
— | 10–2000 W | — |
— | 10–1000 W | — |
calcium chloride solution
CaCl₂
TEM images (FIGS. 2A and 2B) of graphene oxide in graphene oxide/water sol show obvious folding structures at the edge of graphene oxide.
HRTEM images (FIGS. 3A and 3B) of graphene oxide/styrene butadiene rubber nanocomposite (Example 4) show graphene oxide is evenly dispersed in the SBR substrate in a form of single sheet.
XRD profiles (FIG. 4) of graphite oxide, SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 1), and graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizates (Examples 1 and 9). Characteristic diffraction peaks of graphene oxide do not occur in the nanocomposite, indicating highly delaminated single-sheet dispersion.
FIG. 5A shows clear Schallamach pattern for graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizate (Example 10), indicating rubber substrate and graphene oxide are not massively delaminated and interfacial bonding is excellent. FIG. 5B shows white carbon black/SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 2) for comparison.
Tensile Strength At 100 Percent Elongation |
| 3.7 MPa |
graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Tensile Strength At 300 Percent Elongation | 11.1 MPa | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Air Permeability Coefficient | 2.35e-? m² s⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
— | 10–2000 W | — |
— | 10–1000 W | — |
calcium chloride solution
CaCl₂
TEM images (FIGS. 2A and 2B) of graphene oxide in graphene oxide/water sol show obvious folding structures at the edge of graphene oxide.
HRTEM images (FIGS. 3A and 3B) of graphene oxide/styrene butadiene rubber nanocomposite (Example 4) show graphene oxide is evenly dispersed in the SBR substrate in a form of single sheet.
XRD profiles (FIG. 4) of graphite oxide, SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 1), and graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizates (Examples 1 and 9). Characteristic diffraction peaks of graphene oxide do not occur in the nanocomposite, indicating highly delaminated single-sheet dispersion.
FIG. 5A shows clear Schallamach pattern for graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizate (Example 10), indicating rubber substrate and graphene oxide are not massively delaminated and interfacial bonding is excellent. FIG. 5B shows white carbon black/SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 2) for comparison.
Tensile Strength At 100 Percent Elongation |
| 3.7 MPa |
graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Tensile Strength At 300 Percent Elongation | 11.1 MPa | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Air Permeability Coefficient | 2.35e-? m² s⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
— | 10–2000 W | — |
— | 10–1000 W | — |
calcium chloride solution
CaCl₂
TEM images (FIGS. 2A and 2B) of graphene oxide in graphene oxide/water sol show obvious folding structures at the edge of graphene oxide.
HRTEM images (FIGS. 3A and 3B) of graphene oxide/styrene butadiene rubber nanocomposite (Example 4) show graphene oxide is evenly dispersed in the SBR substrate in a form of single sheet.
XRD profiles (FIG. 4) of graphite oxide, SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 1), and graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizates (Examples 1 and 9). Characteristic diffraction peaks of graphene oxide do not occur in the nanocomposite, indicating highly delaminated single-sheet dispersion.
FIG. 5A shows clear Schallamach pattern for graphene oxide/SBR vulcanizate (Example 10), indicating rubber substrate and graphene oxide are not massively delaminated and interfacial bonding is excellent. FIG. 5B shows white carbon black/SBR vulcanizate (Contrast 2) for comparison.
Tensile Strength At 100 Percent Elongation |
| 3.7 MPa |
graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Tensile Strength At 300 Percent Elongation | 11.1 MPa | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
Air Permeability Coefficient | 2.35e-? m² s⁻¹ Pa⁻¹ | graphene oxide/rubber nanocomposite |
— | 10–2000 W | — |
— | 10–1000 W | — |