Patent
graphene anode
water remediation cell
silicone
epoxy resin (bisphenol A, bisphenol F, novolac, aliphatic, or glycidylamine)
acetone
C₃H₆O
polymer electrode substrate
organic polymer (polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, or polyethylene)
polystyrene
nanomaterial (e.g., nanosprings)
carbonaceous starting material
sulfur
S
FIG. 12 is a spectrum obtained from Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic analysis (FT- I R) of graphene on a germanium disk.
FIG. 13 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 14 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 15 is a XPS spectrum of the C i s core level state of graphene.
FIG. 19 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating graphene flakes made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method. FI …
FIG. 20 is a SEM image of the edge of a graphene sample produced by working embodiments, illustrating its layered characteristics (also illustrated in
FIG. 24 is a TEM image showing layered characteristics of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material on a nanometer scale.
FIG. 26 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating layers of graphene made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method.
FIG. 27 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating diatoms coated with graphene using an embodiment of the method disclosed …
FIG. 28 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating uncoated diatoms.
FIG. 32 is an SEM image of a graphene flake on a copper grid.
FIG. 33 is a TEM image of graphene film, illustrating layers.
FIG. 35 is a 2-dimensional AFM image of graphene for an 8 m x 8 m scanning area.
FIG. 37 is a micron scale AFM of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material, with a co rr esponding height profile.
FIG. 38 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 600 *C.
FIG. 39 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 400 C.
FIG. 40 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 550 C.
FIG. 41 is a graph of the Ferrari amorphization trajectory as applied to an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 44 is a graph of cu rr ent (A) versus potential (m V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of Ru(NH₃) 63+/2+ and Fe(CN) 63-4- with a 1 cm2 …
FIG. 46 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 47 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 48 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a pyrolytic graphite electrode …
FIG. 49 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 50 is a combined graph illustrating cyclic voltammograms of pyroltic graphite and the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 56 is a graph of current (mA/cm 2) vs. potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) illustrating a cyclic voltammogram of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene anode in 1 …
graphene capacitance narrower claimed range | 250–675 F/cm2 | graphene |
aqueous ultracapacitor stored energy (exemplary value) | — | — |
graphene anode anodic potential (claimed range) | 2–3 V | graphene |
total electrochemical window (claimed range) | 3–5 V | graphene |
graphene micro-crystalline grain size (claimed range) | 2–15 nm | graphene |
graphene grain size (specific claimed value) | — | graphene |
— | 5–20 eV | — |
Temperature | 800–1300 °C | — |
Duration | 2–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 4–10 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–10 minutes | — |
Thickness | 2–10 nm | — |
Thickness | 2–8 nm | — |
Duration | 0–60 minutes | — |
Voltage | 0.1–0.5 V | — |
Voltage | 0.2–0.6 V | — |
Voltage | 0.9–1.1 V | — |
Duration | 12–15 minutes | — |
Thickness | 0.01 cm | — |
Voltage | ≥ 1 V | — |
Voltage | ≥ 3 V | — |
Temperature | ≥ 2000 °C | — |
Thickness | about 2 nm to about 15 Pa | — |
graphene anode
water remediation cell
silicone
epoxy resin (bisphenol A, bisphenol F, novolac, aliphatic, or glycidylamine)
acetone
C₃H₆O
polymer electrode substrate
organic polymer (polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, or polyethylene)
polystyrene
nanomaterial (e.g., nanosprings)
carbonaceous starting material
sulfur
S
FIG. 12 is a spectrum obtained from Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic analysis (FT- I R) of graphene on a germanium disk.
FIG. 13 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 14 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 15 is a XPS spectrum of the C i s core level state of graphene.
FIG. 19 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating graphene flakes made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method. FI …
FIG. 20 is a SEM image of the edge of a graphene sample produced by working embodiments, illustrating its layered characteristics (also illustrated in
FIG. 24 is a TEM image showing layered characteristics of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material on a nanometer scale.
FIG. 26 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating layers of graphene made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method.
FIG. 27 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating diatoms coated with graphene using an embodiment of the method disclosed …
FIG. 28 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating uncoated diatoms.
FIG. 32 is an SEM image of a graphene flake on a copper grid.
FIG. 33 is a TEM image of graphene film, illustrating layers.
FIG. 35 is a 2-dimensional AFM image of graphene for an 8 m x 8 m scanning area.
FIG. 37 is a micron scale AFM of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material, with a co rr esponding height profile.
FIG. 38 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 600 *C.
FIG. 39 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 400 C.
FIG. 40 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 550 C.
FIG. 41 is a graph of the Ferrari amorphization trajectory as applied to an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 44 is a graph of cu rr ent (A) versus potential (m V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of Ru(NH₃) 63+/2+ and Fe(CN) 63-4- with a 1 cm2 …
FIG. 46 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 47 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 48 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a pyrolytic graphite electrode …
FIG. 49 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 50 is a combined graph illustrating cyclic voltammograms of pyroltic graphite and the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 56 is a graph of current (mA/cm 2) vs. potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) illustrating a cyclic voltammogram of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene anode in 1 …
graphene capacitance narrower claimed range | 250–675 F/cm2 | graphene |
aqueous ultracapacitor stored energy (exemplary value) | — | — |
graphene anode anodic potential (claimed range) | 2–3 V | graphene |
total electrochemical window (claimed range) | 3–5 V | graphene |
graphene micro-crystalline grain size (claimed range) | 2–15 nm | graphene |
graphene grain size (specific claimed value) | — | graphene |
— | 5–20 eV | — |
Temperature | 800–1300 °C | — |
Duration | 2–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 4–10 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–10 minutes | — |
Thickness | 2–10 nm | — |
Thickness | 2–8 nm | — |
Duration | 0–60 minutes | — |
Voltage | 0.1–0.5 V | — |
Voltage | 0.2–0.6 V | — |
Voltage | 0.9–1.1 V | — |
Duration | 12–15 minutes | — |
Thickness | 0.01 cm | — |
Voltage | ≥ 1 V | — |
Voltage | ≥ 3 V | — |
Temperature | ≥ 2000 °C | — |
Thickness | about 2 nm to about 15 Pa | — |
graphene anode
water remediation cell
silicone
epoxy resin (bisphenol A, bisphenol F, novolac, aliphatic, or glycidylamine)
acetone
C₃H₆O
polymer electrode substrate
organic polymer (polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, or polyethylene)
polystyrene
nanomaterial (e.g., nanosprings)
carbonaceous starting material
sulfur
S
FIG. 12 is a spectrum obtained from Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic analysis (FT- I R) of graphene on a germanium disk.
FIG. 13 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 14 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 15 is a XPS spectrum of the C i s core level state of graphene.
FIG. 19 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating graphene flakes made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method. FI …
FIG. 20 is a SEM image of the edge of a graphene sample produced by working embodiments, illustrating its layered characteristics (also illustrated in
FIG. 24 is a TEM image showing layered characteristics of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material on a nanometer scale.
FIG. 26 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating layers of graphene made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method.
FIG. 27 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating diatoms coated with graphene using an embodiment of the method disclosed …
FIG. 28 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating uncoated diatoms.
FIG. 32 is an SEM image of a graphene flake on a copper grid.
FIG. 33 is a TEM image of graphene film, illustrating layers.
FIG. 35 is a 2-dimensional AFM image of graphene for an 8 m x 8 m scanning area.
FIG. 37 is a micron scale AFM of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material, with a co rr esponding height profile.
FIG. 38 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 600 *C.
FIG. 39 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 400 C.
FIG. 40 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 550 C.
FIG. 41 is a graph of the Ferrari amorphization trajectory as applied to an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 44 is a graph of cu rr ent (A) versus potential (m V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of Ru(NH₃) 63+/2+ and Fe(CN) 63-4- with a 1 cm2 …
FIG. 46 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 47 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 48 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a pyrolytic graphite electrode …
FIG. 49 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 50 is a combined graph illustrating cyclic voltammograms of pyroltic graphite and the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 56 is a graph of current (mA/cm 2) vs. potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) illustrating a cyclic voltammogram of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene anode in 1 …
graphene capacitance narrower claimed range | 250–675 F/cm2 | graphene |
aqueous ultracapacitor stored energy (exemplary value) | — | — |
graphene anode anodic potential (claimed range) | 2–3 V | graphene |
total electrochemical window (claimed range) | 3–5 V | graphene |
graphene micro-crystalline grain size (claimed range) | 2–15 nm | graphene |
graphene grain size (specific claimed value) | — | graphene |
— | 5–20 eV | — |
Temperature | 800–1300 °C | — |
Duration | 2–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 4–10 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–10 minutes | — |
Thickness | 2–10 nm | — |
Thickness | 2–8 nm | — |
Duration | 0–60 minutes | — |
Voltage | 0.1–0.5 V | — |
Voltage | 0.2–0.6 V | — |
Voltage | 0.9–1.1 V | — |
Duration | 12–15 minutes | — |
Thickness | 0.01 cm | — |
Voltage | ≥ 1 V | — |
Voltage | ≥ 3 V | — |
Temperature | ≥ 2000 °C | — |
Thickness | about 2 nm to about 15 Pa | — |
graphene anode
water remediation cell
silicone
epoxy resin (bisphenol A, bisphenol F, novolac, aliphatic, or glycidylamine)
acetone
C₃H₆O
polymer electrode substrate
organic polymer (polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, or polyethylene)
polystyrene
nanomaterial (e.g., nanosprings)
carbonaceous starting material
sulfur
S
FIG. 12 is a spectrum obtained from Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopic analysis (FT- I R) of graphene on a germanium disk.
FIG. 13 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 14 is a spectrum obtained from x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analysis of a graphene sample made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed …
FIG. 15 is a XPS spectrum of the C i s core level state of graphene.
FIG. 19 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating graphene flakes made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method. FI …
FIG. 20 is a SEM image of the edge of a graphene sample produced by working embodiments, illustrating its layered characteristics (also illustrated in
FIG. 24 is a TEM image showing layered characteristics of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material on a nanometer scale.
FIG. 26 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating layers of graphene made using a particular embodiment of the disclosed method.
FIG. 27 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating diatoms coated with graphene using an embodiment of the method disclosed …
FIG. 28 is an image produced by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) illustrating uncoated diatoms.
FIG. 32 is an SEM image of a graphene flake on a copper grid.
FIG. 33 is a TEM image of graphene film, illustrating layers.
FIG. 35 is a 2-dimensional AFM image of graphene for an 8 m x 8 m scanning area.
FIG. 37 is a micron scale AFM of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material, with a co rr esponding height profile.
FIG. 38 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 600 *C.
FIG. 39 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 400 C.
FIG. 40 is a Raman spectrum obtained from thermogravimetric analysis, illustrating the peak obtained at 550 C.
FIG. 41 is a graph of the Ferrari amorphization trajectory as applied to an embodiment of the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 44 is a graph of cu rr ent (A) versus potential (m V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of Ru(NH₃) 63+/2+ and Fe(CN) 63-4- with a 1 cm2 …
FIG. 46 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 47 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 48 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a pyrolytic graphite electrode …
FIG. 49 is a graph of cu rr ent (g A/cm 2) versus potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) and illustrates cyclic voltammograms of an embodiment of the graphene anode …
FIG. 50 is a combined graph illustrating cyclic voltammograms of pyroltic graphite and the disclosed graphene material.
FIG. 56 is a graph of current (mA/cm 2) vs. potential (V vs. Ag/AgCl) illustrating a cyclic voltammogram of an embodiment of the disclosed graphene anode in 1 …
graphene capacitance narrower claimed range | 250–675 F/cm2 | graphene |
aqueous ultracapacitor stored energy (exemplary value) | — | — |
graphene anode anodic potential (claimed range) | 2–3 V | graphene |
total electrochemical window (claimed range) | 3–5 V | graphene |
graphene micro-crystalline grain size (claimed range) | 2–15 nm | graphene |
graphene grain size (specific claimed value) | — | graphene |
— | 5–20 eV | — |
Temperature | 800–1300 °C | — |
Duration | 2–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 4–10 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–20 minutes | — |
Duration | 5–10 minutes | — |
Thickness | 2–10 nm | — |
Thickness | 2–8 nm | — |
Duration | 0–60 minutes | — |
Voltage | 0.1–0.5 V | — |
Voltage | 0.2–0.6 V | — |
Voltage | 0.9–1.1 V | — |
Duration | 12–15 minutes | — |
Thickness | 0.01 cm | — |
Voltage | ≥ 1 V | — |
Voltage | ≥ 3 V | — |
Temperature | ≥ 2000 °C | — |
Thickness | about 2 nm to about 15 Pa | — |