Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, 10 including a plasma nozzle, afterglow reaction chamber and hot gas filter, for the plasma synthesis …
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a simplified drawing of the plasma nozzle of
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 illustrates the interface between the plasma nozzle, wave guide and reaction chamber with a purging ring;
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 shows a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation showing a triple vortex structure;
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 illustrates a CFD model of a twin nozzle using offset tangent planes;
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 illustrates a plasma nozzle, modified to prevent carbon build up by tapering the exit, with an additional channel to allow constant cooling via inert gas …
FIG. 7
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 presents a Raman spectrum of a graphitic carbon sample synthesised at 2 kW, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min CH₄ flow rate;
FIG. 11
FIGS. 11-13 present further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 12
FIG. 12—15 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, HGF B₂
FIG. 13
FIG. 13—6 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, bag filter Example 4: Experiments with CO₂ and Associated TEM Analysis
FIG. 14
FIG. 14 presents TEM analysis of carbon materials syn- thesised at 6 kW, 21.5 L/min of Natural Gas, 5 L/min of CO2;
FIG. 15
FIG. 15 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 16
FIG. 16 presents Raman spectra of samples of carbon materials produced (in line with the TEM observations in
FIG. 17
FIG. 17 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 18
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
FIG. 19
FIG. 19 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 20
FIG. 20 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 55 using NG in helium for (a) 3 kW (D/G 0.73, G/2D 1.8) and (b) 6 kW (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3);
FIG. 21
FIG. 21 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 22
FIG. 22 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 60 using 3.6 U/min NG at kW in (a) argon (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) and (b) helium (D/G 0.97, G/2D 1.8);
FIG. 23
FIG. 23 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 24
FIG. 24 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 65 using 3.6 L/min NG at 6 kW in (a) helium (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3) and (b) nitrogen (D/G 1.2, G/2D 1.5); B₂
FIG. 25
FIG. 25 is a series of schematic illustrations to explain the expression “chord central angle” in relation to the arrange- ment of plasma nozzles relative to …
FIG. 26
FIG. 26 illustrates an example of alternative apparatus for the plasma synthesis of graphitic products including gra- phene;
FIG. 27
FIG. 27 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 2 cm from the plasma zone during plasma ignition;
FIG. 28
FIG. 28 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 4 cm from the plasma zone during typical operation; and
FIG. 29
FIG. 29 shows a configuration of thermocouples in the reaction chamber, as used to obtain the test results shown in
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
1 independent · 8 dependent
1
Independentgraphenecarbon-containing speciesplasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
A method of synthesizing graphitic products including graphene, the method comprising: supplying a process gas to a plasma nozzle that is coupled to a reaction chamber, the process gas comprising a carbon-containing species; supplying radio frequency radiation to the process gas within the plasma nozzle, so as to produce a nonequilibrium plasma within the plasma nozzle, and passing the process gas through a radio frequency radiation field within the plasma nozzle, to thereby cause cracking of the carbon-containing species within the plasma nozzle, wherein the radio frequency radia-tion comprises microwave radiation; forming multiple vortices in the process gas within the plasma nozzle and subjecting the multiple vortices to the microwave radiation; wherein the plasma nozzle is arranged such that an afterglow of the plasma extends into the reaction cham-ber, the cracked carbon-containing species also passes into the reaction chamber, and the cracked carbon-containing species recombines within the afterglow, so as to form the graphitic products including the gra-phene; applying cooling to the afterglow on exiting the plasma nozzle, wherein the cooling comprises one of water cooling or gas cooling; subjecting the reaction chamber to gas filtration to collect solid carbon from the gas phase, wherein the gas filtration is performed using a gas filtration system that is attached above the reaction chamber and comprises an elongate chamber comprising one or more filter candles; and blowing gas through the elongate chamber to dislodge the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles as a result of the gas filtration, to cause the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles to fall down, through the reaction chamber, for extraction through an exit at the bottom of the reaction chamber.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the plasma at substantially atmospheric pressure.
3
Dependent← claim 1natural gasCH₄C₂H₆C₂H₄C₃H₈C₄H₁₀
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species comprises one of natural gas, CH4, C₂H6, C₂H4, C₃H₈ or C₄H10. 23 24
4
Dependent← claim 1ArN₂He
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising one of argon, nitrogen, or helium; and wherein the ratio of carbon-containing species to buffer gas in the process gas is 50:50 or less; or around 20:80.
5
Dependent← claim 1CO₂
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising carbon dioxide.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the after-glow within the reaction chamber has an operating tempera-ture of lower than 3500° C., lower than 1000° C., or around 300° C.; and wherein the temperature outside the plasma nozzle, at the carbon formation point within the afterglow, is in the range of 800° C. to 1200° C.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising delivering gas around an interface between the plasma nozzle and the reaction chamber.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising extracting the graphitic products using a continuous extrac-tion process.
9
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species is cracked without the process gas being introduced into a thermal zone; wherein no catalyst is used in forming the graphitic products; and wherein no external heating is applied during the forma-tion of the graphitic products. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
plasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
No layer stack recorded.
Materials
Materials described outside the worked examples.
graphene
Synthesis Product
carbon-containing species
Process Gas Precursor
Process steps
Additional fabrication and treatment steps described in the patent.
1
Microwave Plasma Synthesis
Step 1
Temperature
300, 800, 1000, 1200, 3500°C
Process details
cooling:water cooling or gas cooling
catalyst:
Characterization
Measurements and analyses referenced in the patent, with their drawing references.
tem
TEM
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, 10 including a plasma nozzle, afterglow reaction chamber and hot gas filter, for the plasma synthesis …
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a simplified drawing of the plasma nozzle of
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 illustrates the interface between the plasma nozzle, wave guide and reaction chamber with a purging ring;
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 shows a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation showing a triple vortex structure;
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 illustrates a CFD model of a twin nozzle using offset tangent planes;
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 illustrates a plasma nozzle, modified to prevent carbon build up by tapering the exit, with an additional channel to allow constant cooling via inert gas …
FIG. 7
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 presents a Raman spectrum of a graphitic carbon sample synthesised at 2 kW, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min CH₄ flow rate;
FIG. 11
FIGS. 11-13 present further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 12
FIG. 12—15 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, HGF B₂
FIG. 13
FIG. 13—6 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, bag filter Example 4: Experiments with CO₂ and Associated TEM Analysis
FIG. 14
FIG. 14 presents TEM analysis of carbon materials syn- thesised at 6 kW, 21.5 L/min of Natural Gas, 5 L/min of CO2;
FIG. 15
FIG. 15 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 16
FIG. 16 presents Raman spectra of samples of carbon materials produced (in line with the TEM observations in
FIG. 17
FIG. 17 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 18
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
FIG. 19
FIG. 19 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 20
FIG. 20 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 55 using NG in helium for (a) 3 kW (D/G 0.73, G/2D 1.8) and (b) 6 kW (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3);
FIG. 21
FIG. 21 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 22
FIG. 22 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 60 using 3.6 U/min NG at kW in (a) argon (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) and (b) helium (D/G 0.97, G/2D 1.8);
FIG. 23
FIG. 23 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 24
FIG. 24 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 65 using 3.6 L/min NG at 6 kW in (a) helium (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3) and (b) nitrogen (D/G 1.2, G/2D 1.5); B₂
FIG. 25
FIG. 25 is a series of schematic illustrations to explain the expression “chord central angle” in relation to the arrange- ment of plasma nozzles relative to …
FIG. 26
FIG. 26 illustrates an example of alternative apparatus for the plasma synthesis of graphitic products including gra- phene;
FIG. 27
FIG. 27 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 2 cm from the plasma zone during plasma ignition;
FIG. 28
FIG. 28 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 4 cm from the plasma zone during typical operation; and
FIG. 29
FIG. 29 shows a configuration of thermocouples in the reaction chamber, as used to obtain the test results shown in
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
1 independent · 8 dependent
1
Independentgraphenecarbon-containing speciesplasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
A method of synthesizing graphitic products including graphene, the method comprising: supplying a process gas to a plasma nozzle that is coupled to a reaction chamber, the process gas comprising a carbon-containing species; supplying radio frequency radiation to the process gas within the plasma nozzle, so as to produce a nonequilibrium plasma within the plasma nozzle, and passing the process gas through a radio frequency radiation field within the plasma nozzle, to thereby cause cracking of the carbon-containing species within the plasma nozzle, wherein the radio frequency radia-tion comprises microwave radiation; forming multiple vortices in the process gas within the plasma nozzle and subjecting the multiple vortices to the microwave radiation; wherein the plasma nozzle is arranged such that an afterglow of the plasma extends into the reaction cham-ber, the cracked carbon-containing species also passes into the reaction chamber, and the cracked carbon-containing species recombines within the afterglow, so as to form the graphitic products including the gra-phene; applying cooling to the afterglow on exiting the plasma nozzle, wherein the cooling comprises one of water cooling or gas cooling; subjecting the reaction chamber to gas filtration to collect solid carbon from the gas phase, wherein the gas filtration is performed using a gas filtration system that is attached above the reaction chamber and comprises an elongate chamber comprising one or more filter candles; and blowing gas through the elongate chamber to dislodge the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles as a result of the gas filtration, to cause the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles to fall down, through the reaction chamber, for extraction through an exit at the bottom of the reaction chamber.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the plasma at substantially atmospheric pressure.
3
Dependent← claim 1natural gasCH₄C₂H₆C₂H₄C₃H₈C₄H₁₀
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species comprises one of natural gas, CH4, C₂H6, C₂H4, C₃H₈ or C₄H10. 23 24
4
Dependent← claim 1ArN₂He
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising one of argon, nitrogen, or helium; and wherein the ratio of carbon-containing species to buffer gas in the process gas is 50:50 or less; or around 20:80.
5
Dependent← claim 1CO₂
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising carbon dioxide.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the after-glow within the reaction chamber has an operating tempera-ture of lower than 3500° C., lower than 1000° C., or around 300° C.; and wherein the temperature outside the plasma nozzle, at the carbon formation point within the afterglow, is in the range of 800° C. to 1200° C.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising delivering gas around an interface between the plasma nozzle and the reaction chamber.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising extracting the graphitic products using a continuous extrac-tion process.
9
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species is cracked without the process gas being introduced into a thermal zone; wherein no catalyst is used in forming the graphitic products; and wherein no external heating is applied during the forma-tion of the graphitic products. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
plasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
No layer stack recorded.
Materials
Materials described outside the worked examples.
graphene
Synthesis Product
carbon-containing species
Process Gas Precursor
Process steps
Additional fabrication and treatment steps described in the patent.
1
Microwave Plasma Synthesis
Step 1
Temperature
300, 800, 1000, 1200, 3500°C
Process details
cooling:water cooling or gas cooling
catalyst:
Characterization
Measurements and analyses referenced in the patent, with their drawing references.
tem
TEM
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, 10 including a plasma nozzle, afterglow reaction chamber and hot gas filter, for the plasma synthesis …
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a simplified drawing of the plasma nozzle of
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 illustrates the interface between the plasma nozzle, wave guide and reaction chamber with a purging ring;
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 shows a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation showing a triple vortex structure;
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 illustrates a CFD model of a twin nozzle using offset tangent planes;
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 illustrates a plasma nozzle, modified to prevent carbon build up by tapering the exit, with an additional channel to allow constant cooling via inert gas …
FIG. 7
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 presents a Raman spectrum of a graphitic carbon sample synthesised at 2 kW, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min CH₄ flow rate;
FIG. 11
FIGS. 11-13 present further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 12
FIG. 12—15 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, HGF B₂
FIG. 13
FIG. 13—6 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, bag filter Example 4: Experiments with CO₂ and Associated TEM Analysis
FIG. 14
FIG. 14 presents TEM analysis of carbon materials syn- thesised at 6 kW, 21.5 L/min of Natural Gas, 5 L/min of CO2;
FIG. 15
FIG. 15 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 16
FIG. 16 presents Raman spectra of samples of carbon materials produced (in line with the TEM observations in
FIG. 17
FIG. 17 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 18
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
FIG. 19
FIG. 19 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 20
FIG. 20 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 55 using NG in helium for (a) 3 kW (D/G 0.73, G/2D 1.8) and (b) 6 kW (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3);
FIG. 21
FIG. 21 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 22
FIG. 22 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 60 using 3.6 U/min NG at kW in (a) argon (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) and (b) helium (D/G 0.97, G/2D 1.8);
FIG. 23
FIG. 23 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 24
FIG. 24 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 65 using 3.6 L/min NG at 6 kW in (a) helium (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3) and (b) nitrogen (D/G 1.2, G/2D 1.5); B₂
FIG. 25
FIG. 25 is a series of schematic illustrations to explain the expression “chord central angle” in relation to the arrange- ment of plasma nozzles relative to …
FIG. 26
FIG. 26 illustrates an example of alternative apparatus for the plasma synthesis of graphitic products including gra- phene;
FIG. 27
FIG. 27 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 2 cm from the plasma zone during plasma ignition;
FIG. 28
FIG. 28 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 4 cm from the plasma zone during typical operation; and
FIG. 29
FIG. 29 shows a configuration of thermocouples in the reaction chamber, as used to obtain the test results shown in
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
1 independent · 8 dependent
1
Independentgraphenecarbon-containing speciesplasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
A method of synthesizing graphitic products including graphene, the method comprising: supplying a process gas to a plasma nozzle that is coupled to a reaction chamber, the process gas comprising a carbon-containing species; supplying radio frequency radiation to the process gas within the plasma nozzle, so as to produce a nonequilibrium plasma within the plasma nozzle, and passing the process gas through a radio frequency radiation field within the plasma nozzle, to thereby cause cracking of the carbon-containing species within the plasma nozzle, wherein the radio frequency radia-tion comprises microwave radiation; forming multiple vortices in the process gas within the plasma nozzle and subjecting the multiple vortices to the microwave radiation; wherein the plasma nozzle is arranged such that an afterglow of the plasma extends into the reaction cham-ber, the cracked carbon-containing species also passes into the reaction chamber, and the cracked carbon-containing species recombines within the afterglow, so as to form the graphitic products including the gra-phene; applying cooling to the afterglow on exiting the plasma nozzle, wherein the cooling comprises one of water cooling or gas cooling; subjecting the reaction chamber to gas filtration to collect solid carbon from the gas phase, wherein the gas filtration is performed using a gas filtration system that is attached above the reaction chamber and comprises an elongate chamber comprising one or more filter candles; and blowing gas through the elongate chamber to dislodge the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles as a result of the gas filtration, to cause the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles to fall down, through the reaction chamber, for extraction through an exit at the bottom of the reaction chamber.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the plasma at substantially atmospheric pressure.
3
Dependent← claim 1natural gasCH₄C₂H₆C₂H₄C₃H₈C₄H₁₀
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species comprises one of natural gas, CH4, C₂H6, C₂H4, C₃H₈ or C₄H10. 23 24
4
Dependent← claim 1ArN₂He
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising one of argon, nitrogen, or helium; and wherein the ratio of carbon-containing species to buffer gas in the process gas is 50:50 or less; or around 20:80.
5
Dependent← claim 1CO₂
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising carbon dioxide.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the after-glow within the reaction chamber has an operating tempera-ture of lower than 3500° C., lower than 1000° C., or around 300° C.; and wherein the temperature outside the plasma nozzle, at the carbon formation point within the afterglow, is in the range of 800° C. to 1200° C.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising delivering gas around an interface between the plasma nozzle and the reaction chamber.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising extracting the graphitic products using a continuous extrac-tion process.
9
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species is cracked without the process gas being introduced into a thermal zone; wherein no catalyst is used in forming the graphitic products; and wherein no external heating is applied during the forma-tion of the graphitic products. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
plasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
No layer stack recorded.
Materials
Materials described outside the worked examples.
graphene
Synthesis Product
carbon-containing species
Process Gas Precursor
Process steps
Additional fabrication and treatment steps described in the patent.
1
Microwave Plasma Synthesis
Step 1
Temperature
300, 800, 1000, 1200, 3500°C
Process details
cooling:water cooling or gas cooling
catalyst:
Characterization
Measurements and analyses referenced in the patent, with their drawing references.
tem
TEM
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
Patent drawings and their descriptions. Click a drawing to enlarge it.
FIG. 1
FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, 10 including a plasma nozzle, afterglow reaction chamber and hot gas filter, for the plasma synthesis …
FIG. 2
FIG. 2 is a simplified drawing of the plasma nozzle of
FIG. 3
FIG. 3 illustrates the interface between the plasma nozzle, wave guide and reaction chamber with a purging ring;
FIG. 4
FIG. 4 shows a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation showing a triple vortex structure;
FIG. 5
FIG. 5 illustrates a CFD model of a twin nozzle using offset tangent planes;
FIG. 6
FIG. 6 illustrates a plasma nozzle, modified to prevent carbon build up by tapering the exit, with an additional channel to allow constant cooling via inert gas …
FIG. 7
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 8
FIG. 9
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 10
FIG. 10 presents a Raman spectrum of a graphitic carbon sample synthesised at 2 kW, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min CH₄ flow rate;
FIG. 11
FIGS. 11-13 present further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
FIG. 12
FIG. 12—15 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, HGF B₂
FIG. 13
FIG. 13—6 L/min Ar, 22 L/min NG, 6 kW, bag filter Example 4: Experiments with CO₂ and Associated TEM Analysis
FIG. 14
FIG. 14 presents TEM analysis of carbon materials syn- thesised at 6 kW, 21.5 L/min of Natural Gas, 5 L/min of CO2;
FIG. 15
FIG. 15 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 16
FIG. 16 presents Raman spectra of samples of carbon materials produced (in line with the TEM observations in
FIG. 17
FIG. 17 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 18
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
FIG. 19
FIG. 19 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 20
FIG. 20 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 55 using NG in helium for (a) 3 kW (D/G 0.73, G/2D 1.8) and (b) 6 kW (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3);
FIG. 21
FIG. 21 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 22
FIG. 22 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 60 using 3.6 U/min NG at kW in (a) argon (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) and (b) helium (D/G 0.97, G/2D 1.8);
FIG. 23
FIG. 23 presents further transmission electron micro- graphs of synthesised carbon materials;
FIG. 24
FIG. 24 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained 65 using 3.6 L/min NG at 6 kW in (a) helium (D/G 0.83, G/2D 1.3) and (b) nitrogen (D/G 1.2, G/2D 1.5); B₂
FIG. 25
FIG. 25 is a series of schematic illustrations to explain the expression “chord central angle” in relation to the arrange- ment of plasma nozzles relative to …
FIG. 26
FIG. 26 illustrates an example of alternative apparatus for the plasma synthesis of graphitic products including gra- phene;
FIG. 27
FIG. 27 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 2 cm from the plasma zone during plasma ignition;
FIG. 28
FIG. 28 shows an experimentally-measured temperature profile at a point 4 cm from the plasma zone during typical operation; and
FIG. 29
FIG. 29 shows a configuration of thermocouples in the reaction chamber, as used to obtain the test results shown in
Claims
Claims define the patent's legal scope. Independent claims stand alone; dependent claims (nested) narrow them. Click a claim to expand its dependents.
1 independent · 8 dependent
1
Independentgraphenecarbon-containing speciesplasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
A method of synthesizing graphitic products including graphene, the method comprising: supplying a process gas to a plasma nozzle that is coupled to a reaction chamber, the process gas comprising a carbon-containing species; supplying radio frequency radiation to the process gas within the plasma nozzle, so as to produce a nonequilibrium plasma within the plasma nozzle, and passing the process gas through a radio frequency radiation field within the plasma nozzle, to thereby cause cracking of the carbon-containing species within the plasma nozzle, wherein the radio frequency radia-tion comprises microwave radiation; forming multiple vortices in the process gas within the plasma nozzle and subjecting the multiple vortices to the microwave radiation; wherein the plasma nozzle is arranged such that an afterglow of the plasma extends into the reaction cham-ber, the cracked carbon-containing species also passes into the reaction chamber, and the cracked carbon-containing species recombines within the afterglow, so as to form the graphitic products including the gra-phene; applying cooling to the afterglow on exiting the plasma nozzle, wherein the cooling comprises one of water cooling or gas cooling; subjecting the reaction chamber to gas filtration to collect solid carbon from the gas phase, wherein the gas filtration is performed using a gas filtration system that is attached above the reaction chamber and comprises an elongate chamber comprising one or more filter candles; and blowing gas through the elongate chamber to dislodge the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles as a result of the gas filtration, to cause the graphitic products collected by the one or more filter candles to fall down, through the reaction chamber, for extraction through an exit at the bottom of the reaction chamber.
2
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the plasma at substantially atmospheric pressure.
3
Dependent← claim 1natural gasCH₄C₂H₆C₂H₄C₃H₈C₄H₁₀
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species comprises one of natural gas, CH4, C₂H6, C₂H4, C₃H₈ or C₄H10. 23 24
4
Dependent← claim 1ArN₂He
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising one of argon, nitrogen, or helium; and wherein the ratio of carbon-containing species to buffer gas in the process gas is 50:50 or less; or around 20:80.
5
Dependent← claim 1CO₂
The method according to claim 1, wherein the process gas further comprises a buffer gas, the buffer gas comprising carbon dioxide.
6
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the after-glow within the reaction chamber has an operating tempera-ture of lower than 3500° C., lower than 1000° C., or around 300° C.; and wherein the temperature outside the plasma nozzle, at the carbon formation point within the afterglow, is in the range of 800° C. to 1200° C.
7
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising delivering gas around an interface between the plasma nozzle and the reaction chamber.
8
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, further comprising extracting the graphitic products using a continuous extrac-tion process.
9
Dependent← claim 1
The method according to claim 1, wherein the carbon-containing species is cracked without the process gas being introduced into a thermal zone; wherein no catalyst is used in forming the graphitic products; and wherein no external heating is applied during the forma-tion of the graphitic products. ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗
Device structures
Layer stacks claimed or described, ordered top of device to substrate.
plasma synthesis apparatus for graphitic products
No layer stack recorded.
Materials
Materials described outside the worked examples.
graphene
Synthesis Product
carbon-containing species
Process Gas Precursor
Process steps
Additional fabrication and treatment steps described in the patent.
1
Microwave Plasma Synthesis
Step 1
Temperature
300, 800, 1000, 1200, 3500°C
Process details
cooling:water cooling or gas cooling
catalyst:
Characterization
Measurements and analyses referenced in the patent, with their drawing references.
tem
TEM
FIGS. 7 and 8 present transmission electron micrographs of synthesised graphitic carbon material;
afterglow temperature range c:<3500, <1000, or ~300
carbon species to buffer ratio:50:50 or less; around 20:80
carbon formation point temperature c:800-1200
Materials:graphenegraphitic products
TEM
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
US 2002/0151604 A12002/0151604 A1 * 10/2002 Detering................ B01J 19/088examiner
US 2004/0262145 A12004/0262145 A1 * 12/2004 Duzhev.................. B01J 19/088examiner
US 2006/0006153 A12006/0006153 A1 * 1/2006 Lee.......................... H05H 1/46examiner
US 2007/0280863 A12007/0280863 A1 * 12/2007 Wira...................... B01J 19/088examiner
US 2008/0056928 A12008/0056928 A1 * 3/2008 Bunce................... C09C 1/3684examiner
US 2009/0214799 A12009/0214799 A1 * 8/2009 Simard.................. B82Y 30/00examiner
US 2010/0072430 A12010/0072430 A1 * 3/2010 Gergely................ H01F 1/0054examiner
US 2010/0301212 A12010/0301212 A1 12/2010 Dato et al.
US 2010/0314788 A12010/0314788 A1 12/2010 Hung et al.
US 2012/0034137 A12012/0034137 A1 * 2/2012 Risby................ H01J 37/32357examiner
US 2012/0090982 A12012/0090982 A1 4/2012 Fullerton et al.
US 2013/0022530 A12013/0022530 A1 * 1/2013 Mercuri................. B82Y 40/00examiner
US 2014/0030447 A12014/0030447 A1 1/2014 Lee et al.
US 2014/0045342 A12014/0045342 A1 2/2014 Mallick et al.
US 2014/0159572 A12014/0159572 A1 6/2014 Risby et al.
US 2014/0219906 A12014/0219906 A1 * 8/2014 Kim...................... C01B 32/194examiner
US 2015/0098877 A12015/0098877 A1 * 4/2015 Hendricksen.......... B01D 53/83examiner
US 2015/0129544 A12015/0129544 A1 * 5/2015 Davis................. H01B 13/0026examiner
US 2016/0217979 A12016/0217979 A1 * 7/2016 Kim.................. H01J 37/32192examiner
US 2019/0006151 A12019/0006151 A1 * 1/2019 Paukner................. B01J 19/088examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 7
WO 2005058755 A1—translation (Year: 2005).
United Kingdom Search Report in counterpart patent application No. GB1510364.1 dated Jun. 25, 2015. International Search Report in counterpart patent application No. PCT/GB2015/051745 dated Aug. 19, 2015. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Nature, a roadmap for graphene, vol. 490, pp. 192-200, Oct. 2012. Segal, M., Nature Nanotechnology, Selling graphene by the ton, vol. 4, pp. 612-614, Oct. 2009. Subrahmanyam, K. S. et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Letters, Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc- discharge method, vol. 113, pp. 4257-4259, Feb. 2009. Chen, Y. et al., Chemical Physics Letters, Mass-production of highly-crystalline few-layer graphene sheets by arc discharge in various H2-inert gas mixtures, vol. 538, pp. 72-76, Apr. 2012. Meunier, J. L. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Homogeneous nucleation of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) in thermal plasma: Tuning the 2D nanoscale geometry, pp. 1-4, Aug. 2013. Anekawa, Y. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Synthesis of graphene-based conductive thin films by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition in a CO/H2 microwave discharge system, 2013. Tatarova, E. et al., Applied Physics Letters, Microwave plasma based single step method for free standing graphene synthesis at atmospheric conditions, vol. 103, pp. 134101-134105, Sep. 2013. Dato, A. et al., Chemical Communications, Clean and highly ordered graphene synthesized in the gas phase, pp. 6095-6097, Aug. 2009. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Science, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, vol. 306, pp. 666-669, Oct. 2004. Castelain, M. et al., Chemical Communications, Supramolecular assembly of graphene with functionalized poly(fluorene-alt- phenylene): the role of the anthraquinone pendant groups, vol. 47, pp. 7677-7679, May 2011. Yan, X. et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry, Solution-chemistry approach to graphene nanostructures, vol. 21, pp. 3295-3300, 2011. Emstev, K. et al., Nature Materials, Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide, vol. 8, pp. 203-207, Mar. 2009. Wurstbauer, U. et al., Carbon, Molecular beam growth of graphene nanocrystals on dielectric substrates, vol. 50, pp. 4822-4829, 2012. Dhar, S. et al., AIP Advances, a new route to graphene layers by selective laser ablation, vol. 1, p. 022109, 2011. McAllister, M. J. et al., Chemistry of Materials, Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite, vol. 19, pp. 4396-4404, 2007. Vlassiouk, I. et al., Carbon, Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene, vol. 54, pp. 58-67, 2013. Reina, A. et al., Nano Letters, Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 30-35, 2009.
Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets. Angstron Materials; Vorbeck Materials in Jessup, Maryland; XG Sciences in East Lansing, Michigan. Hernandez, Y. et al., Nanotechnology, High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite, vol. 3, pp. 563- 568, Sep. 2008. Dato, A. et al., New Journal of Physics, Substrate-free microwave synthesis of graphene: experimental conditions and hydrocarbon precursors, vol. 12, p. 125013, 2010. E. Tatarova et al.,“Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets”, Journal of Physics. D: Applied Physics 47, 385501, pp. 1-11, Aug. 22, 2014. Y. Wu et al., “Efficient and Large-Scale Synthesis of Few-Layered Graphene Using an Arc-Discharge Method and Conductivity Stud- ies of the Resulting Films”, Nano Research, vol. 3(9), pp. 661-669, Sep. 2010. M. Leins et al., “An Atmospheric Pressure Microwave Plasma Torch”, 2011. P.L. Fauchais et al., Thermal Spray Fundamentals: From Powder to
Overview of Thermal Spray. Part, Chapter 2, “Overview of Thermal Spray,” Springer: New York, pp. 17-72, 2014. S. Heidenreich et al., Fuel, “Hot gas filtration—a review”, vol. 104, pp. 83-94, 2013. C.-J. Chen et al.,“The Thermal Decomposition of Methane. I. Kinetics of the Primary Decomposition to C2H6 + H2; Rate Constant for the Homogeneous Unimolecular Dissociation of Meth- ane and its Pressure Dependence”, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 3580-3590, 1975. Yang, Z., et al., “Differentiation of alkane isomers through binding energy spectra and total momentum cross sections”, New J. Chem., vol. 38, pp. 1031-1039, 2014. Sun, Q., et al., “Methane activation on Fe4 cluster: a density functional theory study”, Chemical Physics Letters 550, pp. 41-46, 2012. Merlo-Sosa, L., et al., “Dodecane decomposition in a radio- frequency (RF) plasma reactor”, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 3, p. 1542, 2005. Ogungbesan, B., et al., “Experimental validation of local thermal equilibrium in a MW plasma torch for hydrogen production”, Int. J. Hyd. Energy 38, pp. 15210-15218, 2013. Juda, K. L., et al., “Large scale synthesis of carbon nanoforms in a novel atmospheric pressure microwave plasma reactor”, Proceed- ings of ISPC 21, Aug. 2013.
patent2017
METHOD FOR PREPARING BIOMASS GRAPHENE BY USING CELLULOSE AS RAW MATERIAL
afterglow temperature range c:<3500, <1000, or ~300
carbon species to buffer ratio:50:50 or less; around 20:80
carbon formation point temperature c:800-1200
Materials:graphenegraphitic products
TEM
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
US 2002/0151604 A12002/0151604 A1 * 10/2002 Detering................ B01J 19/088examiner
US 2004/0262145 A12004/0262145 A1 * 12/2004 Duzhev.................. B01J 19/088examiner
US 2006/0006153 A12006/0006153 A1 * 1/2006 Lee.......................... H05H 1/46examiner
US 2007/0280863 A12007/0280863 A1 * 12/2007 Wira...................... B01J 19/088examiner
US 2008/0056928 A12008/0056928 A1 * 3/2008 Bunce................... C09C 1/3684examiner
US 2009/0214799 A12009/0214799 A1 * 8/2009 Simard.................. B82Y 30/00examiner
US 2010/0072430 A12010/0072430 A1 * 3/2010 Gergely................ H01F 1/0054examiner
US 2010/0301212 A12010/0301212 A1 12/2010 Dato et al.
US 2010/0314788 A12010/0314788 A1 12/2010 Hung et al.
US 2012/0034137 A12012/0034137 A1 * 2/2012 Risby................ H01J 37/32357examiner
US 2012/0090982 A12012/0090982 A1 4/2012 Fullerton et al.
US 2013/0022530 A12013/0022530 A1 * 1/2013 Mercuri................. B82Y 40/00examiner
US 2014/0030447 A12014/0030447 A1 1/2014 Lee et al.
US 2014/0045342 A12014/0045342 A1 2/2014 Mallick et al.
US 2014/0159572 A12014/0159572 A1 6/2014 Risby et al.
US 2014/0219906 A12014/0219906 A1 * 8/2014 Kim...................... C01B 32/194examiner
US 2015/0098877 A12015/0098877 A1 * 4/2015 Hendricksen.......... B01D 53/83examiner
US 2015/0129544 A12015/0129544 A1 * 5/2015 Davis................. H01B 13/0026examiner
US 2016/0217979 A12016/0217979 A1 * 7/2016 Kim.................. H01J 37/32192examiner
US 2019/0006151 A12019/0006151 A1 * 1/2019 Paukner................. B01J 19/088examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 7
WO 2005058755 A1—translation (Year: 2005).
United Kingdom Search Report in counterpart patent application No. GB1510364.1 dated Jun. 25, 2015. International Search Report in counterpart patent application No. PCT/GB2015/051745 dated Aug. 19, 2015. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Nature, a roadmap for graphene, vol. 490, pp. 192-200, Oct. 2012. Segal, M., Nature Nanotechnology, Selling graphene by the ton, vol. 4, pp. 612-614, Oct. 2009. Subrahmanyam, K. S. et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Letters, Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc- discharge method, vol. 113, pp. 4257-4259, Feb. 2009. Chen, Y. et al., Chemical Physics Letters, Mass-production of highly-crystalline few-layer graphene sheets by arc discharge in various H2-inert gas mixtures, vol. 538, pp. 72-76, Apr. 2012. Meunier, J. L. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Homogeneous nucleation of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) in thermal plasma: Tuning the 2D nanoscale geometry, pp. 1-4, Aug. 2013. Anekawa, Y. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Synthesis of graphene-based conductive thin films by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition in a CO/H2 microwave discharge system, 2013. Tatarova, E. et al., Applied Physics Letters, Microwave plasma based single step method for free standing graphene synthesis at atmospheric conditions, vol. 103, pp. 134101-134105, Sep. 2013. Dato, A. et al., Chemical Communications, Clean and highly ordered graphene synthesized in the gas phase, pp. 6095-6097, Aug. 2009. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Science, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, vol. 306, pp. 666-669, Oct. 2004. Castelain, M. et al., Chemical Communications, Supramolecular assembly of graphene with functionalized poly(fluorene-alt- phenylene): the role of the anthraquinone pendant groups, vol. 47, pp. 7677-7679, May 2011. Yan, X. et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry, Solution-chemistry approach to graphene nanostructures, vol. 21, pp. 3295-3300, 2011. Emstev, K. et al., Nature Materials, Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide, vol. 8, pp. 203-207, Mar. 2009. Wurstbauer, U. et al., Carbon, Molecular beam growth of graphene nanocrystals on dielectric substrates, vol. 50, pp. 4822-4829, 2012. Dhar, S. et al., AIP Advances, a new route to graphene layers by selective laser ablation, vol. 1, p. 022109, 2011. McAllister, M. J. et al., Chemistry of Materials, Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite, vol. 19, pp. 4396-4404, 2007. Vlassiouk, I. et al., Carbon, Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene, vol. 54, pp. 58-67, 2013. Reina, A. et al., Nano Letters, Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 30-35, 2009.
Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets. Angstron Materials; Vorbeck Materials in Jessup, Maryland; XG Sciences in East Lansing, Michigan. Hernandez, Y. et al., Nanotechnology, High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite, vol. 3, pp. 563- 568, Sep. 2008. Dato, A. et al., New Journal of Physics, Substrate-free microwave synthesis of graphene: experimental conditions and hydrocarbon precursors, vol. 12, p. 125013, 2010. E. Tatarova et al.,“Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets”, Journal of Physics. D: Applied Physics 47, 385501, pp. 1-11, Aug. 22, 2014. Y. Wu et al., “Efficient and Large-Scale Synthesis of Few-Layered Graphene Using an Arc-Discharge Method and Conductivity Stud- ies of the Resulting Films”, Nano Research, vol. 3(9), pp. 661-669, Sep. 2010. M. Leins et al., “An Atmospheric Pressure Microwave Plasma Torch”, 2011. P.L. Fauchais et al., Thermal Spray Fundamentals: From Powder to
Overview of Thermal Spray. Part, Chapter 2, “Overview of Thermal Spray,” Springer: New York, pp. 17-72, 2014. S. Heidenreich et al., Fuel, “Hot gas filtration—a review”, vol. 104, pp. 83-94, 2013. C.-J. Chen et al.,“The Thermal Decomposition of Methane. I. Kinetics of the Primary Decomposition to C2H6 + H2; Rate Constant for the Homogeneous Unimolecular Dissociation of Meth- ane and its Pressure Dependence”, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 3580-3590, 1975. Yang, Z., et al., “Differentiation of alkane isomers through binding energy spectra and total momentum cross sections”, New J. Chem., vol. 38, pp. 1031-1039, 2014. Sun, Q., et al., “Methane activation on Fe4 cluster: a density functional theory study”, Chemical Physics Letters 550, pp. 41-46, 2012. Merlo-Sosa, L., et al., “Dodecane decomposition in a radio- frequency (RF) plasma reactor”, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 3, p. 1542, 2005. Ogungbesan, B., et al., “Experimental validation of local thermal equilibrium in a MW plasma torch for hydrogen production”, Int. J. Hyd. Energy 38, pp. 15210-15218, 2013. Juda, K. L., et al., “Large scale synthesis of carbon nanoforms in a novel atmospheric pressure microwave plasma reactor”, Proceed- ings of ISPC 21, Aug. 2013.
patent2017
METHOD FOR PREPARING BIOMASS GRAPHENE BY USING CELLULOSE AS RAW MATERIAL
afterglow temperature range c:<3500, <1000, or ~300
carbon species to buffer ratio:50:50 or less; around 20:80
carbon formation point temperature c:800-1200
Materials:graphenegraphitic products
TEM
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
US 2002/0151604 A12002/0151604 A1 * 10/2002 Detering................ B01J 19/088examiner
US 2004/0262145 A12004/0262145 A1 * 12/2004 Duzhev.................. B01J 19/088examiner
US 2006/0006153 A12006/0006153 A1 * 1/2006 Lee.......................... H05H 1/46examiner
US 2007/0280863 A12007/0280863 A1 * 12/2007 Wira...................... B01J 19/088examiner
US 2008/0056928 A12008/0056928 A1 * 3/2008 Bunce................... C09C 1/3684examiner
US 2009/0214799 A12009/0214799 A1 * 8/2009 Simard.................. B82Y 30/00examiner
US 2010/0072430 A12010/0072430 A1 * 3/2010 Gergely................ H01F 1/0054examiner
US 2010/0301212 A12010/0301212 A1 12/2010 Dato et al.
US 2010/0314788 A12010/0314788 A1 12/2010 Hung et al.
US 2012/0034137 A12012/0034137 A1 * 2/2012 Risby................ H01J 37/32357examiner
US 2012/0090982 A12012/0090982 A1 4/2012 Fullerton et al.
US 2013/0022530 A12013/0022530 A1 * 1/2013 Mercuri................. B82Y 40/00examiner
US 2014/0030447 A12014/0030447 A1 1/2014 Lee et al.
US 2014/0045342 A12014/0045342 A1 2/2014 Mallick et al.
US 2014/0159572 A12014/0159572 A1 6/2014 Risby et al.
US 2014/0219906 A12014/0219906 A1 * 8/2014 Kim...................... C01B 32/194examiner
US 2015/0098877 A12015/0098877 A1 * 4/2015 Hendricksen.......... B01D 53/83examiner
US 2015/0129544 A12015/0129544 A1 * 5/2015 Davis................. H01B 13/0026examiner
US 2016/0217979 A12016/0217979 A1 * 7/2016 Kim.................. H01J 37/32192examiner
US 2019/0006151 A12019/0006151 A1 * 1/2019 Paukner................. B01J 19/088examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 7
WO 2005058755 A1—translation (Year: 2005).
United Kingdom Search Report in counterpart patent application No. GB1510364.1 dated Jun. 25, 2015. International Search Report in counterpart patent application No. PCT/GB2015/051745 dated Aug. 19, 2015. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Nature, a roadmap for graphene, vol. 490, pp. 192-200, Oct. 2012. Segal, M., Nature Nanotechnology, Selling graphene by the ton, vol. 4, pp. 612-614, Oct. 2009. Subrahmanyam, K. S. et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Letters, Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc- discharge method, vol. 113, pp. 4257-4259, Feb. 2009. Chen, Y. et al., Chemical Physics Letters, Mass-production of highly-crystalline few-layer graphene sheets by arc discharge in various H2-inert gas mixtures, vol. 538, pp. 72-76, Apr. 2012. Meunier, J. L. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Homogeneous nucleation of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) in thermal plasma: Tuning the 2D nanoscale geometry, pp. 1-4, Aug. 2013. Anekawa, Y. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Synthesis of graphene-based conductive thin films by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition in a CO/H2 microwave discharge system, 2013. Tatarova, E. et al., Applied Physics Letters, Microwave plasma based single step method for free standing graphene synthesis at atmospheric conditions, vol. 103, pp. 134101-134105, Sep. 2013. Dato, A. et al., Chemical Communications, Clean and highly ordered graphene synthesized in the gas phase, pp. 6095-6097, Aug. 2009. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Science, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, vol. 306, pp. 666-669, Oct. 2004. Castelain, M. et al., Chemical Communications, Supramolecular assembly of graphene with functionalized poly(fluorene-alt- phenylene): the role of the anthraquinone pendant groups, vol. 47, pp. 7677-7679, May 2011. Yan, X. et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry, Solution-chemistry approach to graphene nanostructures, vol. 21, pp. 3295-3300, 2011. Emstev, K. et al., Nature Materials, Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide, vol. 8, pp. 203-207, Mar. 2009. Wurstbauer, U. et al., Carbon, Molecular beam growth of graphene nanocrystals on dielectric substrates, vol. 50, pp. 4822-4829, 2012. Dhar, S. et al., AIP Advances, a new route to graphene layers by selective laser ablation, vol. 1, p. 022109, 2011. McAllister, M. J. et al., Chemistry of Materials, Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite, vol. 19, pp. 4396-4404, 2007. Vlassiouk, I. et al., Carbon, Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene, vol. 54, pp. 58-67, 2013. Reina, A. et al., Nano Letters, Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 30-35, 2009.
Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets. Angstron Materials; Vorbeck Materials in Jessup, Maryland; XG Sciences in East Lansing, Michigan. Hernandez, Y. et al., Nanotechnology, High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite, vol. 3, pp. 563- 568, Sep. 2008. Dato, A. et al., New Journal of Physics, Substrate-free microwave synthesis of graphene: experimental conditions and hydrocarbon precursors, vol. 12, p. 125013, 2010. E. Tatarova et al.,“Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets”, Journal of Physics. D: Applied Physics 47, 385501, pp. 1-11, Aug. 22, 2014. Y. Wu et al., “Efficient and Large-Scale Synthesis of Few-Layered Graphene Using an Arc-Discharge Method and Conductivity Stud- ies of the Resulting Films”, Nano Research, vol. 3(9), pp. 661-669, Sep. 2010. M. Leins et al., “An Atmospheric Pressure Microwave Plasma Torch”, 2011. P.L. Fauchais et al., Thermal Spray Fundamentals: From Powder to
Overview of Thermal Spray. Part, Chapter 2, “Overview of Thermal Spray,” Springer: New York, pp. 17-72, 2014. S. Heidenreich et al., Fuel, “Hot gas filtration—a review”, vol. 104, pp. 83-94, 2013. C.-J. Chen et al.,“The Thermal Decomposition of Methane. I. Kinetics of the Primary Decomposition to C2H6 + H2; Rate Constant for the Homogeneous Unimolecular Dissociation of Meth- ane and its Pressure Dependence”, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 3580-3590, 1975. Yang, Z., et al., “Differentiation of alkane isomers through binding energy spectra and total momentum cross sections”, New J. Chem., vol. 38, pp. 1031-1039, 2014. Sun, Q., et al., “Methane activation on Fe4 cluster: a density functional theory study”, Chemical Physics Letters 550, pp. 41-46, 2012. Merlo-Sosa, L., et al., “Dodecane decomposition in a radio- frequency (RF) plasma reactor”, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 3, p. 1542, 2005. Ogungbesan, B., et al., “Experimental validation of local thermal equilibrium in a MW plasma torch for hydrogen production”, Int. J. Hyd. Energy 38, pp. 15210-15218, 2013. Juda, K. L., et al., “Large scale synthesis of carbon nanoforms in a novel atmospheric pressure microwave plasma reactor”, Proceed- ings of ISPC 21, Aug. 2013.
patent2017
METHOD FOR PREPARING BIOMASS GRAPHENE BY USING CELLULOSE AS RAW MATERIAL
afterglow temperature range c:<3500, <1000, or ~300
carbon species to buffer ratio:50:50 or less; around 20:80
carbon formation point temperature c:800-1200
Materials:graphenegraphitic products
TEM
FIG. 9 presents transmission electron micrographs of graphitic carbon material synthesised at 2 kW microwave power, 24 L/min N₂+6 L/min mains natural gas (NG) …
FIG. 18 presents Raman spectra of samples obtained for 50 (a) Low NG (D/G 0.68, G/2D 1.2) vs (b) high NG (D/G 1.0, G/2D 1.8) flows in argon at 5 kW microwave …
US 2002/0151604 A12002/0151604 A1 * 10/2002 Detering................ B01J 19/088examiner
US 2004/0262145 A12004/0262145 A1 * 12/2004 Duzhev.................. B01J 19/088examiner
US 2006/0006153 A12006/0006153 A1 * 1/2006 Lee.......................... H05H 1/46examiner
US 2007/0280863 A12007/0280863 A1 * 12/2007 Wira...................... B01J 19/088examiner
US 2008/0056928 A12008/0056928 A1 * 3/2008 Bunce................... C09C 1/3684examiner
US 2009/0214799 A12009/0214799 A1 * 8/2009 Simard.................. B82Y 30/00examiner
US 2010/0072430 A12010/0072430 A1 * 3/2010 Gergely................ H01F 1/0054examiner
US 2010/0301212 A12010/0301212 A1 12/2010 Dato et al.
US 2010/0314788 A12010/0314788 A1 12/2010 Hung et al.
US 2012/0034137 A12012/0034137 A1 * 2/2012 Risby................ H01J 37/32357examiner
US 2012/0090982 A12012/0090982 A1 4/2012 Fullerton et al.
US 2013/0022530 A12013/0022530 A1 * 1/2013 Mercuri................. B82Y 40/00examiner
US 2014/0030447 A12014/0030447 A1 1/2014 Lee et al.
US 2014/0045342 A12014/0045342 A1 2/2014 Mallick et al.
US 2014/0159572 A12014/0159572 A1 6/2014 Risby et al.
US 2014/0219906 A12014/0219906 A1 * 8/2014 Kim...................... C01B 32/194examiner
US 2015/0098877 A12015/0098877 A1 * 4/2015 Hendricksen.......... B01D 53/83examiner
US 2015/0129544 A12015/0129544 A1 * 5/2015 Davis................. H01B 13/0026examiner
US 2016/0217979 A12016/0217979 A1 * 7/2016 Kim.................. H01J 37/32192examiner
US 2019/0006151 A12019/0006151 A1 * 1/2019 Paukner................. B01J 19/088examiner
Cited non-patent literature · 7
WO 2005058755 A1—translation (Year: 2005).
United Kingdom Search Report in counterpart patent application No. GB1510364.1 dated Jun. 25, 2015. International Search Report in counterpart patent application No. PCT/GB2015/051745 dated Aug. 19, 2015. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Nature, a roadmap for graphene, vol. 490, pp. 192-200, Oct. 2012. Segal, M., Nature Nanotechnology, Selling graphene by the ton, vol. 4, pp. 612-614, Oct. 2009. Subrahmanyam, K. S. et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Letters, Simple method of preparing graphene flakes by an arc- discharge method, vol. 113, pp. 4257-4259, Feb. 2009. Chen, Y. et al., Chemical Physics Letters, Mass-production of highly-crystalline few-layer graphene sheets by arc discharge in various H2-inert gas mixtures, vol. 538, pp. 72-76, Apr. 2012. Meunier, J. L. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Homogeneous nucleation of graphene nanoflakes (GNFs) in thermal plasma: Tuning the 2D nanoscale geometry, pp. 1-4, Aug. 2013. Anekawa, Y. et al., 21st International Symposium on Plasma
Chemistry, Synthesis of graphene-based conductive thin films by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition in a CO/H2 microwave discharge system, 2013. Tatarova, E. et al., Applied Physics Letters, Microwave plasma based single step method for free standing graphene synthesis at atmospheric conditions, vol. 103, pp. 134101-134105, Sep. 2013. Dato, A. et al., Chemical Communications, Clean and highly ordered graphene synthesized in the gas phase, pp. 6095-6097, Aug. 2009. Novoselov, K. S. et al., Science, Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, vol. 306, pp. 666-669, Oct. 2004. Castelain, M. et al., Chemical Communications, Supramolecular assembly of graphene with functionalized poly(fluorene-alt- phenylene): the role of the anthraquinone pendant groups, vol. 47, pp. 7677-7679, May 2011. Yan, X. et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry, Solution-chemistry approach to graphene nanostructures, vol. 21, pp. 3295-3300, 2011. Emstev, K. et al., Nature Materials, Towards wafer-size graphene layers by atmospheric pressure graphitization of silicon carbide, vol. 8, pp. 203-207, Mar. 2009. Wurstbauer, U. et al., Carbon, Molecular beam growth of graphene nanocrystals on dielectric substrates, vol. 50, pp. 4822-4829, 2012. Dhar, S. et al., AIP Advances, a new route to graphene layers by selective laser ablation, vol. 1, p. 022109, 2011. McAllister, M. J. et al., Chemistry of Materials, Single sheet functionalized graphene by oxidation and thermal expansion of graphite, vol. 19, pp. 4396-4404, 2007. Vlassiouk, I. et al., Carbon, Large scale atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition of graphene, vol. 54, pp. 58-67, 2013. Reina, A. et al., Nano Letters, Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 30-35, 2009.
Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets. Angstron Materials; Vorbeck Materials in Jessup, Maryland; XG Sciences in East Lansing, Michigan. Hernandez, Y. et al., Nanotechnology, High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite, vol. 3, pp. 563- 568, Sep. 2008. Dato, A. et al., New Journal of Physics, Substrate-free microwave synthesis of graphene: experimental conditions and hydrocarbon precursors, vol. 12, p. 125013, 2010. E. Tatarova et al.,“Microwave plasmas applied for the synthesis of free standing graphene sheets”, Journal of Physics. D: Applied Physics 47, 385501, pp. 1-11, Aug. 22, 2014. Y. Wu et al., “Efficient and Large-Scale Synthesis of Few-Layered Graphene Using an Arc-Discharge Method and Conductivity Stud- ies of the Resulting Films”, Nano Research, vol. 3(9), pp. 661-669, Sep. 2010. M. Leins et al., “An Atmospheric Pressure Microwave Plasma Torch”, 2011. P.L. Fauchais et al., Thermal Spray Fundamentals: From Powder to
Overview of Thermal Spray. Part, Chapter 2, “Overview of Thermal Spray,” Springer: New York, pp. 17-72, 2014. S. Heidenreich et al., Fuel, “Hot gas filtration—a review”, vol. 104, pp. 83-94, 2013. C.-J. Chen et al.,“The Thermal Decomposition of Methane. I. Kinetics of the Primary Decomposition to C2H6 + H2; Rate Constant for the Homogeneous Unimolecular Dissociation of Meth- ane and its Pressure Dependence”, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 3580-3590, 1975. Yang, Z., et al., “Differentiation of alkane isomers through binding energy spectra and total momentum cross sections”, New J. Chem., vol. 38, pp. 1031-1039, 2014. Sun, Q., et al., “Methane activation on Fe4 cluster: a density functional theory study”, Chemical Physics Letters 550, pp. 41-46, 2012. Merlo-Sosa, L., et al., “Dodecane decomposition in a radio- frequency (RF) plasma reactor”, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, vol. 3, p. 1542, 2005. Ogungbesan, B., et al., “Experimental validation of local thermal equilibrium in a MW plasma torch for hydrogen production”, Int. J. Hyd. Energy 38, pp. 15210-15218, 2013. Juda, K. L., et al., “Large scale synthesis of carbon nanoforms in a novel atmospheric pressure microwave plasma reactor”, Proceed- ings of ISPC 21, Aug. 2013.
patent2017
METHOD FOR PREPARING BIOMASS GRAPHENE BY USING CELLULOSE AS RAW MATERIAL