Patent
nickel
Ni
organic polymer
uncured epoxy resin
polyamic acid
cured epoxy resin
polyimide
modified hexagonal boron nitride
nickel nitrate
Ni(NO₃)2
cobalt
Co
iron
Fe
Figure 3 is a TEM of a cross-section of the modified hBN of Example 1, showing the disruption of the tight packing and linearity of adjacent platelets as a result of the formation of interstitial nano-scale metallic nickel sheet between hBN platelets. 25
Figure 4 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of a hBN particle with a few particles of nickel scattered about, as prepared according to Comparative Example A.
Figure 5 is a TEM of the cross-section of the hBN plus nickel compound of Comparative Example A. The morphology is indistinguishable from that in
Figure 6 show the x-ray diffraction (XRD) results obtained on the 5 compound of Comparative Example A. The shoulder in the range of 42: 28 5 44 is indicative of the formation of turbostratic BN.
Figure 7 is a SEM of the surface of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1. Numerous metallic Ni particles are shown adhering to the surface, as well as below the surface layer. 10
Figure 8 is a TEM showing the growth of epitaxial Ni crystals along the edge of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1.
Figure 13 shows the XRD patterns at different magnetic field 25 strengths as crystalline orientation changes in the magnetic field of the modified hBN/polyamic acid composite of
ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
hBN particle maximum in-plane dimension (claimed range) | 0.5–50 micrometers | BN |
ferromagnetic metal particle diameter (claimed range) | 2–300 nm | ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
modified hBN loading in composite (claimed range) | 1–40 wt% | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
magnetic field required for orientation of modified hBN | ≤ 1000 gauss | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
Thickness | 8–14 µm | — |
Thickness | 16–30 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.7–1 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.5–50 µm | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 second | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 min | — |
nickel
Ni
organic polymer
uncured epoxy resin
polyamic acid
cured epoxy resin
polyimide
modified hexagonal boron nitride
nickel nitrate
Ni(NO₃)2
cobalt
Co
iron
Fe
Figure 3 is a TEM of a cross-section of the modified hBN of Example 1, showing the disruption of the tight packing and linearity of adjacent platelets as a result of the formation of interstitial nano-scale metallic nickel sheet between hBN platelets. 25
Figure 4 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of a hBN particle with a few particles of nickel scattered about, as prepared according to Comparative Example A.
Figure 5 is a TEM of the cross-section of the hBN plus nickel compound of Comparative Example A. The morphology is indistinguishable from that in
Figure 6 show the x-ray diffraction (XRD) results obtained on the 5 compound of Comparative Example A. The shoulder in the range of 42: 28 5 44 is indicative of the formation of turbostratic BN.
Figure 7 is a SEM of the surface of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1. Numerous metallic Ni particles are shown adhering to the surface, as well as below the surface layer. 10
Figure 8 is a TEM showing the growth of epitaxial Ni crystals along the edge of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1.
Figure 13 shows the XRD patterns at different magnetic field 25 strengths as crystalline orientation changes in the magnetic field of the modified hBN/polyamic acid composite of
ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
hBN particle maximum in-plane dimension (claimed range) | 0.5–50 micrometers | BN |
ferromagnetic metal particle diameter (claimed range) | 2–300 nm | ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
modified hBN loading in composite (claimed range) | 1–40 wt% | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
magnetic field required for orientation of modified hBN | ≤ 1000 gauss | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
Thickness | 8–14 µm | — |
Thickness | 16–30 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.7–1 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.5–50 µm | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 second | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 min | — |
nickel
Ni
organic polymer
uncured epoxy resin
polyamic acid
cured epoxy resin
polyimide
modified hexagonal boron nitride
nickel nitrate
Ni(NO₃)2
cobalt
Co
iron
Fe
Figure 3 is a TEM of a cross-section of the modified hBN of Example 1, showing the disruption of the tight packing and linearity of adjacent platelets as a result of the formation of interstitial nano-scale metallic nickel sheet between hBN platelets. 25
Figure 4 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of a hBN particle with a few particles of nickel scattered about, as prepared according to Comparative Example A.
Figure 5 is a TEM of the cross-section of the hBN plus nickel compound of Comparative Example A. The morphology is indistinguishable from that in
Figure 6 show the x-ray diffraction (XRD) results obtained on the 5 compound of Comparative Example A. The shoulder in the range of 42: 28 5 44 is indicative of the formation of turbostratic BN.
Figure 7 is a SEM of the surface of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1. Numerous metallic Ni particles are shown adhering to the surface, as well as below the surface layer. 10
Figure 8 is a TEM showing the growth of epitaxial Ni crystals along the edge of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1.
Figure 13 shows the XRD patterns at different magnetic field 25 strengths as crystalline orientation changes in the magnetic field of the modified hBN/polyamic acid composite of
ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
hBN particle maximum in-plane dimension (claimed range) | 0.5–50 micrometers | BN |
ferromagnetic metal particle diameter (claimed range) | 2–300 nm | ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
modified hBN loading in composite (claimed range) | 1–40 wt% | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
magnetic field required for orientation of modified hBN | ≤ 1000 gauss | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
Thickness | 8–14 µm | — |
Thickness | 16–30 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.7–1 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.5–50 µm | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 second | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 min | — |
nickel
Ni
organic polymer
uncured epoxy resin
polyamic acid
cured epoxy resin
polyimide
modified hexagonal boron nitride
nickel nitrate
Ni(NO₃)2
cobalt
Co
iron
Fe
Figure 3 is a TEM of a cross-section of the modified hBN of Example 1, showing the disruption of the tight packing and linearity of adjacent platelets as a result of the formation of interstitial nano-scale metallic nickel sheet between hBN platelets. 25
Figure 4 is a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of the surface of a hBN particle with a few particles of nickel scattered about, as prepared according to Comparative Example A.
Figure 5 is a TEM of the cross-section of the hBN plus nickel compound of Comparative Example A. The morphology is indistinguishable from that in
Figure 6 show the x-ray diffraction (XRD) results obtained on the 5 compound of Comparative Example A. The shoulder in the range of 42: 28 5 44 is indicative of the formation of turbostratic BN.
Figure 7 is a SEM of the surface of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1. Numerous metallic Ni particles are shown adhering to the surface, as well as below the surface layer. 10
Figure 8 is a TEM showing the growth of epitaxial Ni crystals along the edge of the Ni-modified hBN of Example 1.
Figure 13 shows the XRD patterns at different magnetic field 25 strengths as crystalline orientation changes in the magnetic field of the modified hBN/polyamic acid composite of
ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
hBN particle maximum in-plane dimension (claimed range) | 0.5–50 micrometers | BN |
ferromagnetic metal particle diameter (claimed range) | 2–300 nm | ferromagnetic metal (interstitial) |
modified hBN loading in composite (claimed range) | 1–40 wt% | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
magnetic field required for orientation of modified hBN | ≤ 1000 gauss | modified hexagonal boron nitride |
Thickness | 8–14 µm | — |
Thickness | 16–30 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.7–1 µm | — |
Thickness | 0.5–50 µm | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 second | — |
Duration | ≤ 1 min | — |